Now, I ask, have we considered in this matter of our Bibles and the challenges against the King James Version, the quotations of those who still held the original or a first copy in their hands? Study has been done which has soundly proven from quotations of early Christian "Fathers" (First and Second Century preachers and writers) who quoted Bible in their written messages and other writings that the same words as translated in the King James Version is what they had. Why then do we hear of this "later manuscript" argument? When in these early Christian's historical evidence, we have a yet older "manuscript" which has not the flaws of these the liberal scholars claim, nor is this more ancient manuscript found in trash containers, but in active use as authorized words of God.
Just asking.